Skip to content
ERP Expert

Station 10 of 14

Closing and the Long Silence: After Everyone Says Yes

Ahmed Hassan Algammal7 min read

What you leave this station with

You distinguish procedural silence from a frozen buyer, you hold three moves that unfreeze a deal without pressure, and you know how to close on the next step rather than on the ask.

A proposal delivered, a demo that landed, a negotiation settled at a number both sides accepted. Everyone said good, let’s move on it.

Then nothing. A week, two, three.

This is not an unusual state in ERP selling. It is the most common one.

The number that explains what is happening

Return to what opened this path: in The JOLT Effect by Matthew Dixon and Ted McKenna (2022, more than 2.5 million recorded calls), 40% to 60% of qualified deals end in “no decision”.

The detail the book adds — and it inverts the whole understanding of closing — is that in roughly 56% of those no-decision deals, the buyer was convinced of the need. The seller did not fail to establish the problem. He failed at something else entirely.

What stopped the buyer was not do I need this? It was “what if I choose wrong?”

Those are two different fears, and they are not treated with the same instrument:

  • Fear of inaction — treated with value, which you already did in discovery.
  • Fear of the wrong action — not treated with more value. More enthusiasm here deepens the freeze rather than breaking it.

Whoever meets the second with the tools of the first — a new proposal, extra features, greater energy — is pushing on a frozen man to make him move, and thereby proving to him that the decision is heavier than he thought.

And why they freeze: the room you do not enter

Gartner, in a survey published on 7 May 2025 covering 632 buyers surveyed between August and September 2024, found that 74% of buying teams experience “unhealthy conflict” internally, and that teams reaching consensus were 2.5 times more likely to report a high-quality deal.

Read those two figures alongside the decision map: the silence you are living through is usually not hesitation in one person. It is disagreement between people who have never been in one room — and the likelihood is that you spoke to each of them separately and left every meeting with the impression of agreement.

Three moves that break the freeze

1. Name the risk out loud. Fears that are not spoken are not treated. Say what he is thinking:

“I know your biggest worry isn’t the price. It’s that this project goes the way the last one did and your name is on it.”

Whoever says that loses nothing — he is saying what is already in the room. Whoever does not say it leaves the fear working in the dark, and there it grows unopposed.

2. Shrink the decision. Replace “shall we start the project?” with a far smaller decision: a paid, bounded design session, or a data review, or a two-day scoping workshop. A large decision paralyses; a small one gets taken and drags the rest behind it.

And beware this becoming the pilot-project trap: the condition is that it has a decision date and a written criterion.

3. Offer the exit plan. Give him something to do if things go badly — scheduled review points, a written stop criterion, what work he keeps if you part. An option that can be reversed gets chosen faster.

Closing is not an ask

“Can we sign today?” puts your contact between yes and no, and the easier of the two is let me look into it. You have gained nothing and lost two weeks.

Correct closing is agreement on the next step, with a date and a name. No meeting ends without: what happens next, who does it, and when.

And the question that saves months is a question about the route, not about the signature:

“Who does this paper pass through before it reaches signature? And how long does each step usually take?”

The answer gives you a real schedule instead of a guess, and reveals immediately whether the route contains a stage you had never heard of.

How to read the silence

Not all silence is the same. Distinguish two kinds.

Procedural silence. The file is with finance, or awaiting a board, or in an approval cycle. Its signature is that you can name the stage and its date. It is treated with disciplined follow-up.

Freeze silence. No known stage, replies getting shorter, dates postponed with no stated reason. Its true signature is that you cannot name what is being waited for.

The second is not treated with more follow-up. Three “just circling back” emails create pressure with no information. The right move is to step back: to the risk, to the smaller decision, and to the question about the route.

And after two attempts with no progress, the correct sentence is the walk-away sentence — written in the walking-away station. It is the single most effective thing at moving frozen deals, because it is the one sentence he does not expect.

The story: four months and one question

The story is composited from real events, and every identifying detail has been changed.

A distribution company. The proposal was accepted, the finance director was enthusiastic, and the owner said fine in a meeting I attended myself.

Then everything stopped. I followed up seven times over four months. The replies were always cordial: next week, God willing.

On the eighth attempt I changed the question. I did not ask about the signature; I asked:

“Is there anything about this project that, if it happened, would be a disaster for you personally?”

And I was quiet.

He said:

“We stopped work for two days when we changed the invoicing system in 2021. If that happens again in the winter season, I’m the one who answers for it.”

Four months of silence were not caused by price, nor by the system, nor even by doubt about me. They were caused by two days in 2021 I had never heard about.

What closed the deal afterwards was not a discount or a new proposal. It was a go-live schedule starting after the season, a written parallel-run plan, and an explicit stop criterion. He signed within two weeks.

The lesson: a frozen deal is not unfrozen by a ninth follow-up email. It is unfrozen by a question about the fear — because nobody volunteers it, and you are the only one who can open the door.

Checklist before you move on

  • For every silent deal: can you name the stage the file is sitting at?
  • Have you asked about the approval route and how long each step takes?
  • Did you name the personal risk out loud, or wait for him to start?
  • Does the customer have a written stop criterion — that is, an exit plan?
  • How many deals are you chasing right now with no next step carrying a date and a name?

Next station

The contract is signed. Here most sellers assume their role is over, and that assumption costs them their highest-closing channel: after the signature.

The stories in this path are composites: real events from more than a thousand companies across Egypt and the UAE, recombined into cases that belong to no single one of them. No personal names, no company names, no detail that identifies anyone. Figures attributed to a published source carry that source by name and date; everything else is stated as an estimate.